The Internet Association: A rogues gallery of online privacy violators

A number of heavy weights in the online space have joined forces to form The Internet Association, a new lobbying group that aims to protect the freedom of the internet and the rights of internet users. But when you look at its membership, and read its policy, it’s pretty clear that protecting online privacy won’t be on their agenda.

No mention of the ‘P’ word

Having formally launched on Wednesday, The Internet Association wasted no time announcing its values and objectives. Here’s a quote from their press release:

“The Internet Association’s policy platform is based on three planks: protecting Internet freedom; fostering innovation and economic growth; and empowering users.The Internet Association and its member companies engage in direct advocacy, educating policymakers on the profound positive impacts of the Internet and Internet companies on jobs, economic growth, freedom, creativity, commerce, productivity, education, prosperity and the global economy.”

All very valiant goals, but did you notice the glaring omission in that list of online sacred cows? Yep, the word “privacy” is conspicously absent. It’s strange, because the idea of “empowering users” and promoting “freedom” surely necessitates a measure of privacy…. Indeed, wasn’t the concept of protecting privacy a significant element of the SOPA and ACTA protests (arguably the biggest internet-related protests in history)? I also checked The Internet Association’s website I couldn’t find a single mention of the word “privacy”. Just more ambigous talk of “Internet freedom”:

“The Internet Association supports policies that protect and promote Internet freedom – information should flow freely across national borders, uninhibited by tariffs, regulations and government censorship that are fundamentally inconsistent with the transnational, free and decentralized nature of the Internet. To preserve the Internet’s role as a conduit for free expression, Internet intermediaries must not be held liable for the speech and activity of Internet users.”

Rogues’ gallery

But it’s not hard to see why The Internet Association is so reluctant to utter the ‘P word’, as many of its members have been accused, and in some cases convicted, of privacy violations. The full membership so far includes: Amazon.com, AOL, eBay, Expedia, Facebook, Google, IAC, LinkedIn, Monster Worldwide, Rackspace, salesforce.com, TripAdvisor, Yahoo!, and Zynga . Let’s take a closer look at some of their track records.

Google: Do I really need to tell you Google’s attitude toward online privacy? This is the company whose former CEO said those concerned about online privacy must have something to hide! We summarised Google’s privacy violations in a previous blog post, back when the search giant suffered the highest fine ever dished out by the FTC, for breaking its own privacy-related promises.

Yahoo!: Yahoo! may be committed protect people from government censorship now, but where were its values when it handed over the personal details of democracy activist Shi Tao to the Chinese government? Tao is currently serving 10 years in prison. Yahoo!’s Hong Kong arm also played a role in the jailing of activists Li Zhi, Jiang Lijun and Wang Xiaoning. I doubt they’ll be getting any assistance from The Internet Association…

Facebook: Barely a month goes by without Facebook’s privacy policy coming under the spotlight. Wikipedia has a nice summary and here is a few privacy concerns raised this year. Of course, Facebook’s entire business rests on selling your data to advertisers, so don’t expect it to join an organisation that has any interest in protecting privacy.

Amazon: Although Amazon’s privacy missteps haven’t attracted as much attention as Google or Facebook’s, it’s still – allegedly - been a naughty boy. Last March a class action lawsuit was filed against the online retailer, alleging that Amazon illegally circumvented cookie blockers on Internet Explorer and tracked users without consent. Users also allege that Amazon sold their data to third party advertisers without consent. Amazon tried to get the lawsuit dismissed in June, but was rejected by a federal judge.

Rackspace: The Internet Association has pledged to “preserve the internet’s role as a conduit for free expression” but back in 2004 Rackspace was involved in some very shady dealings with government agencies that saw them handing over servers belonging to the independent media group IndyMedia. The whole affair is shrouded in secrecy, with no agency taking responsibility for the seizure (the finger has been pointed at Italian, UK and US governments) and no explanation given by Rackspace. The company’s UK branch was investigated for possible breach of the UK Data Protection Act and Rackspace was roundly criticised for not doing more to protect its customers’ data. The EFF has a nice summary of the affair here.

I could mention the privacy lawsuits related Zynga and that colossal user data screw-up by AOL a few years back, but in the interest of brevity I’ll stop here. Of course, I still wish The Internet Association the best of luck - many of its goals are admirable - but judging by its members, online privacy is far from its concern and without a focus on privacy “Internet freedom” will be hard to achieve.

Comments icon
We invite you to discuss this post in our Reddit community or on Twitter. You can also send your feedback to blog@ivpn.net.
Tags: Privacy

Comments

al

24.09.2012

Good blog. I am concerned about hardware, browser, and OS fingerprinting. Would be interesting you could post on how to use iVPN along with the privacy Live CD’s like JonDoFox, TAILS and that Liberte one. Is it possible to use iVPN instead of TOR or perhaps in addition to TOR?

And you’re right about Google. Google is noone’s friend. Every “free” product they put out ther from their search engine to gmail to google docs, whatever, they’re all out to track you and profile you as you travel the internet.

Thanks.

Most people don't need a commercial VPN to work from home securely

Posted on April 7, 2020 by Nick Pestell

Many small businesses and their employees are concerned about the security of their data whilst working from home during the coronavirus pandemic. We see a lot of confusion surrounding this topic, even from fairly technical folk and there is unfortunately a lot of misinformation being spread by commercial VPN providers themselves.

You can't always get what you want: the eternal conflict between lawful access and privacy

Posted on April 19, 2018 by mirimir

In late March, the US Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act) took effect. And predictably, the US Supreme Court just dismissed United States v. Microsoft Corp. In that case, Microsoft was fighting a subpoena for data stored in an Irish data center.

Protect yourself today and get peace of mind

Shut out hackers, identity thieves and the global government surveillance apparatus — every time you go online.