Individuals should be responsible for their online privacy, not governments, says survey

Individuals should be responsible for their online privacy, not governments, says survey

Microsoft has released a new global privacy survey to coincide with International Data Privacy Day (which takes place today in case you didn’t know). The findings reveal a somewhat confused attitude toward online privacy across both Europe and the US, with respondents claiming to care about online privacy, but at the same time failing to take simple actions, such as reading a company’s privacy policy.

You can check out the full report here. Perhaps the biggest finding is that 40% of all Europeans and 46% of all Americans believe that responsibility for consumers’ online privacy rests with the individual. Only 30% of Europeans and 31% of Americans think companies are responsible for their customers’ privacy. When it comes to governments, Europeans see a greater role required, with 30% believing states are responsible for protecting privacy compared to 23% in the US.

As you can see from the chart below, a majority of respondents in both Europe and the US believe that companies should implement technological solutions to protect privacy, rather than offer more transparency or give users more privacy controls. This is a worrying attitude because while it makes life more simple for the consumer, it also places a great deal of trust in companies such as Google and Facebook to ensure its systems really are protecting privacy – as we all know such companies are not deserving of this trust.


Even more disconcerting is the chart below, which shows a majority of respondents (taken from a group Microsoft defines as “tech elites”) do not read the privacy policies of services they sign-up to online. Only 23% of actually read the statements before ticking the box. It’s easy to blame foolish and ignorant consumers for this behaviour. But I reckon there’s very few people who have read every privacy policy they’ve come across. Surely this is a wake-up call for regulators, and any privacy-concerned companies, to implement more digestable and easy-to-read policies. Some companies get this right, but many policies are plagued by legalise and are too dense for the average consumer to read through.


For its part Microsoft says the survey results confirm its belief privacy will be achieved through collaboration with the global community.

“Baseline privacy legislation, industry self-regulation, user education and technology tools need to come together, which is driving a lot of what Microsoft does,” said chief privacy officer Brendon Lynch.

Microsoft also said consumers’ preference for privacy through technology is in-line with its recent decision to implement tracking protection lists for Internet Explorer. However, judging by the results of the survey, it doesn’t seem like much is going to change. When asked “what activities are you willing to trade privacy for ease of use” nearly 50% of US respondents said “shopping,” while almost 40% said gaming, social networking and banking. It’s clear there’s a long way to go before people’s expectations of privacy match-up with their actual online behaviour and attitudes.

Comments icon
We invite you to discuss this post in our Reddit community or on Twitter. You can also send your feedback to
Tags: Privacy

Most people don't need a commercial VPN to work from home securely

Posted on April 7, 2020 by Nick Pestell

Many small businesses and their employees are concerned about the security of their data whilst working from home during the coronavirus pandemic. We see a lot of confusion surrounding this topic, even from fairly technical folk and there is unfortunately a lot of misinformation being spread by commercial VPN providers themselves.

You can't always get what you want: the eternal conflict between lawful access and privacy

Posted on April 19, 2018 by mirimir

In late March, the US Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD Act) took effect. And predictably, the US Supreme Court just dismissed United States v. Microsoft Corp. In that case, Microsoft was fighting a subpoena for data stored in an Irish data center.

Protect yourself today and get peace of mind

Shut out hackers, identity thieves and the global government surveillance apparatus — every time you go online.